胡薩維克出租度假屋
尋找期間有空房的住宿
胡薩維克度假屋
North Apartments Suites
North Apartments Suites
8.4 分 (滿分為 10 分),很好,(45) 篇評價
現售 HK$1,116
一晚
5 月 12 日 - 5 月 13 日
North Mountain View Suites
North Mountain View Suites
10.0 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(8) 篇評價
現售 HK$2,033
一晚
5 月 23 日 - 5 月 24 日
Spacious, luxurious house with a lot of natural wood
Spacious, luxurious house with a lot of natural wood
10.0 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(218) 篇評價
Spacious and comfortable house at the shore
Spacious and comfortable house at the shore
9.8 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(111) 篇評價
Loft house with incredible views of the fjord
Loft house with incredible views of the fjord
10.0 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(114) 篇評價
Wonderful holiday house on the Nollur farm at Eyafjord
Wonderful holiday house on the Nollur farm at Eyafjord
9.8 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(181) 篇評價
Convenient summer house on the Nollur farm at Eyafjord
Convenient summer house on the Nollur farm at Eyafjord
9.8 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(128) 篇評價
Exclusive Villa in the vincinity of Akureyri
Exclusive Villa in the vincinity of Akureyri
9.8 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(155) 篇評價
Villa Mafini - Spacious Canadian - Amazing panorama over Akureyri
Villa Mafini - Spacious Canadian - Amazing panorama over Akureyri
9.6 分 (滿分為 10 分),完美,(42) 篇評價
現售 HK$1,258
一晚
5 月 5 日 - 5 月 6 日
過去 24 小時內找到的最低每晚價格 (2 位成人 1 晚)。價格及供應情況可能會出現變動,可能設有其他條款。
胡薩維克其他類型住宿推介
胡薩維克出租度假屋住宿預算
胡薩維克的出租度假屋豐儉由人,每晚住宿費一般介乎 HK$1,116 至 HK$3,071。
出租度假屋與酒店的分別
度假屋與酒店的最大分別,在於空間大小:一般來說,酒店以「客房」為單位;而度假屋則動輒一兩層「起跳」,起居範圍大得多,且視乎主題風格而定,設計各有特色。酒店主打周到服務,除了有專人辦理登記入住手續,更設有客房送餐、清潔、洗衣、開床等全天候禮遇,旅客連手指頭都不用動一根,專心享受就得!度假屋則更像是「Home away from Home」,可讓你在外獲享「家的感覺」,於更奢華寬敞的空間中,「煮飯仔」為親朋好友下廚亦可,買外賣大吃一餐亦得!再者,度假屋的登記入住處大多另設於專門櫃台或站點,屋內並無職員駐場,私隱度自然較高。
出租度假屋設施
出租度假屋算得上是「豪華型家居」,客廳、獨立睡房、廚房、洗手間等一應俱全,並視乎所在地點與特色,配備以下設施:
- 花園
- 燒烤爐
- 林景或海景露台
- 天台休憩空間
- 健身室
- 泳池
- 按摩浴池
胡薩維克至抵旅遊時機
要入住胡薩維克的度假屋,以 價格最抵,的住宿費則較高。
胡薩維克人氣旅遊月份
胡薩維克的旅遊旺季高峰期為 ,屆時氣候怡人,觀光玩樂活動多不勝數,肯定會讓你留下美好的度假回憶!
常見問題
胡薩維克住宿近期評價Expedia 真實評價
1/5 很差
"This was a very unpleasant experience. I had booked accommodation from March 31st to April 2nd, but on March 30th, I found out that the road to Mývatn was closed. I immediately contacted the hotel and other hotels to inquire about the possibility of a refund. When I confirmed again on March 31st, I discovered that the road to Mývatn was completely closed. However, the hotel insisted that it was the consumer's responsibility and refused to refund. I believe that in such a case of a natural disaster preventing travel, it is unfair to blame the consumer. This situation makes the accommodation unsuitable for staying."
真實旅客,曾入住米湖 - 博加亞冰島酒店
12 日前發表
5/5 優異
"Cozy "
真實旅客,曾入住斯柯加爾日落旅館
8 個月前發表