鄰近邁阿密舊美國郵局酒店 | 熱門邁阿密舊美國郵局住宿限時優惠每晚可低至 HK$788

「非常好！」

「Perfect location close to Brightline, the Omni, museums, and Bayfront. We also loved the hotel. It was top notch. Service was great and the view from our room was incredible.」

「The hotel environment is not good and the service is average」

「Excelente distribución de la habitación y la ubicación maravillosa」

「没有注意」

「冷气的杂音大到无法入睡」

「很好」

「I don't know why. The guest rooms haven't been cleaned at all.」

「Best thing about the room was the location. IMO, the description and photos were quite deceptive. The space was much smaller than depicted and the view of the bay could only be seen from the corner of the small bedroom. Also, the balcony was NOT usable at all. There was barely enough room to open the door and step out onto the ledge to see the bay much less have the option to sit for a while. More disappointing than that was the extremely loud AC unit. The air conditioner fan was so loud...

「very friendly」

「The check-in process was terrible.」

「Very good location & clean apartment. Good communication. 」

「Clean hotel. Not bad. But I’d say more like a lux 4* than a 5*…. Advised to park elsewhere as they charge a extortionate rate of nearly $90 per night and be prepared to wait upto 20 mins for your car. Food was okay but would recommend trying external restaurants. Decent overall stay」

「Nice room and entire residence hotel/condos for a week’s stay. Clean room, comfortable bed, good a/c after maintenance got it working properly, lovely moire of the bay and ocean. Good restaurants a block away in the World Mall. Weather was good in February. 」

「I travel a fair amount but rarely, if ever, leave a review as most places I stay at offer what is expected and not much more. This stay was different. The host was in constant contact with me prior to the visit but once I arrived the difference was notable. I had several small issues that I hesitated to bring up but when I did I got an instant response and resolution. One of the requests didn't really fall into the area that the host would normally be responsible for. I only mentioned it so...